Phage Therapy for Pneumonia and Inflammatory Response

“Supported by years of clinical application in some countries and more recently by literature on experimental models as well as compassionate use in Europe and the USA, bacteriophage (phage) therapy offers a solution for difficult-to-treat bacterial infections. However, studies on the impact of such treatments on the host are still rare.

Methods

Acute pneumonia in mice, induced by intranasal instillation of two pathogenic strains of Escherichia coli (536 and LM33), was treated with two specific bacteriophages (536_P1 and LM33_P1; intranasal) or antibiotics (ceftriaxone, cefoxitin, imipenem-cilastatin; intraperitoneal). Healthy mice also received phages only. The severity of pulmonary edema, acute inflammatory cytokines (blood and lung homogenates), complete blood count, bacterial and bacteriophage counts were obtained at early (≤ 12 h) and late (≥ 20 h) time points. (…..)

Results

The efficacy of bacteriophages in reducing bacterial load was faster than that of antibiotics, but both showed similar endpoints. Bacteriophage treatment was not associated with hyperinflammation; on the contrary, it tended toward lower inflammation and allowed faster correction of blood cell count abnormalities compared to antibiotics. In the absence of bacterial infection, bacteriophage 536_P1 promoted a weak increase in the production of antiviral cytokines (IFN-γ and IL-12) and chemokines in the lung, but not in the blood. However, such variations were no longer observed when bacteriophage 536_P1 was administered to treat infected animals.

Conclusions

“The rapid lysis of bacteria by bacteriophages in vivo does not increase the innate inflammatory response compared to antibiotic treatment.”

 

Source:

Nicolas Dufour, Raphaëlle Delattre, Anne Chevallereau, Jean-Damien Ricard, and Laurent Debarbieux

Phage Therapy for Pneumonia Is Not Associated with an Overstimulation of the Inflammatory Response Compared to Antibiotic Treatment in Mice

https://aac.asm.org/content/early/2019/06/04/AAC.00379-19

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2019, AAC.00379-19. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00379-19

Therapeutic Potential of Phages in Autoimmune Liver Diseases

Autoimmune liver disease (ALD) presents a significant medical challenge, as there is a considerable number of patients for whom current therapy offers questionable or no benefit, yet side effects can be severe, including the development of malignancy. Bacterial viruses (phages) are increasingly recognized as immunomodulators that contribute to immune homeostasis and curb inflammation. Accumulating data suggest that phages may be beneficial in the immunotherapy of ALD. Phages have been shown to downregulate the expression and/or production and activity of factors associated with liver damage [reactive oxygen species, Toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 activation, nuclear factor kappa B (NF-KB) activation,

A. Górski, E. Jończyk-Matysiak, M. Łusiak-Szelachowska, B. Weber-Dąbrowska, R. Międzybrodzki and J. Borysowski
Therapeutic Potential of Phages in Autoimmune Liver Diseases
Clin Exp Immunol. 2018 Apr; 192 (1): 1–6. doi: 10.1111 / cei.13092

Bacteriophages versus antibiotic therapy on gut bacterial communities in green sea turtles

Green sea turtles are endangered herbivorous hindgut fermenters that contribute to a variety of marine ecosystems. In turtle hospitals, weakened turtles are often rehabilitated. Since the precise diagnosis of a disease is difficult, broad-spectrum antibiotics are routinely used as a general treatment, potentially causing collateral damage to the patient’s gut microbiome. Here, we evaluated the concept of using bacteriophages (phages) to eliminate targeted gut bacteria as an alternative to a broad-spectrum antibiotic (enrofloxacin) in clinically healthy, captive green sea turtles. Additionally, the influence of a broad-spectrum antibiotic (enrofloxacin) and phage therapy on the gut bacterial communities of green sea turtles was investigated. Gut bacterial communities in fecal samples were analyzed by sequencing the V1-V3 regions of the bacterial 16S rRNA. Bacteria-specific phage cocktails (P < 0.05) significantly reduced targeted Acinetobacter in phage-treated turtles during therapy. Compared to the control, no significant difference in bacterial diversity and composition was observed in phage-treated turtles. In contrast, bacterial diversity in antibiotic-treated turtles was significantly (P < 0.05) reduced on day 15 and throughout the entire trial. The change in the bacterial microbiota of turtles treated with antibiotics was largely due to an increase in the abundance of Gram-positive Firmicutes and a simultaneous decrease in Gram-negative Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia. Additionally, we observed that the relative abundance of several bacteria at lower taxonomic levels was much less affected by phages than by antibiotics. These data provide proof of concept for phage therapy to manipulate both transient and indigenous bacterial flora in gut-related dysbiosis of turtles.

Source:
Md. Shamim Ahasan, Robert Kinobe, Lisa Elliott, Leigh Owens, Jenni Scott, Jacqueline Picard, Roger Huerlimann, Ellen Ariel

Bacteriophage versus antibiotic therapy on gut bacterial communities of the green sea turtle Chelonia mydas

Environmental Microbiology (2019), first published: April 29, 2019,
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1462-2920.14644

Bacterial Killers in the Clinic

Because they could complement antibiotics, researchers worldwide are working with bacteriophages, bacteria-infecting viruses. The first preparations containing these bacterial killers are already in clinical development. A study is also expected to begin in Germany soon.

Antibiotic therapies are increasingly failing because the disease-causing bacteria have developed resistance. With fatal consequences: in the USA alone, approximately 23,000 people die each year from infections with multidrug-resistant pathogens. According to a recent publication, approximately 33,000 deaths in the EU in 2015 were attributable to multidrug-resistant pathogens (DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30605-4). In 2017, the World Health Organization (WHO) compiled a list of the twelve most dangerous pathogens. This list includes resistant strains of Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, as well as Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, and Helicobacter pylori.

Due to the serious resistance situation, scientists are searching for new ways to eliminate dangerous pathogens such as these. Viruses can become allies in this effort. Special viruses, called bacteriophages, infect strains of a specific bacterial species with high specificity, use them for reproduction, and kill them. These viruses are present wherever it is warm and moist: in ponds, rivers, and oceans, but also in the intestines of humans and animals or on mucous membranes. They are the most widespread organisms on Earth.

In individual cases, these bacterial killers are already being used therapeutically. In May, a research team from London and Pittsburgh reported in the journal “Nature Medicine” on a personalized phage therapy using genetically modified viruses to treat an infection with antibiotic-resistant mycobacteria in a young girl with cystic fibrosis (DOI: 10.1038/s41591-019-0437-z). The patient had been receiving antibiotics for eight years due to chronic colonization with Mycobacterium abscessus. Since the pathogen no longer responded to any antibiotics, the treating physicians decided to search for suitable phages and found them in a phage collection: they assembled a cocktail of three bacteriophages, one of which they genetically modified to be lytic, causing the bacterial cells to burst. Through treatment with the cocktail, the physicians were able to rapidly control the infection.

Momentum for Phage Research
Individual cases such as this are giving phage research momentum. Phage therapies were widespread in Europe and the USA in the pre-antibiotic era, but rapidly lost significance in the West following the discovery of effective antibiotics. In Eastern Europe and Russia, these therapies are still used today. Since approximately 2000, the research field has been revived in the West, driven by the antibiotic crisis but also by the new possibilities offered by sequencing technologies, reports Charles Schmidt in a review article in “Nature Biotechnology” (DOI: 10.1038/s41587-019-0133-z). Universities in the USA are establishing research centers and creating extensive phage libraries. In 2018, the Center for Innovative Phage Applications and Therapeutics (IPATH) at the University of California, San Diego was launched, and the Center for Phage Technology (CPT) has existed at Texas A&M University in College Station since 2010. However, the largest phage library is located at the University of Pittsburgh. It comprises 15,000 isolates, of which 3,000 are fully sequenced. The three phages used in the cystic fibrosis patient also came from this collection.

According to Schmidt, phage libraries are currently being inundated with requests for critically ill patients in whom antibiotics no longer work. When suitable variants are found, they can be used with a type of special authorization from the US regulatory authority FDA as an “Emergency Investigational New Drug.” However, instead of treating individual cases, there are also efforts to bring phage-based preparations to market as approved drugs. “A first wave of clinical trials” is rolling in, writes Schmidt.

In developing such drugs, there are principally two strategies that depend on the diversity of the target bacterium: for pathogens with low diversity such as Staphylococcus aureus, fixed cocktails with three to four phages can be developed that can be produced and stored like other drugs. For genetically very diverse species such as Acinetobacter baumannii, this approach is not suitable because too many phages would have to be combined, which can interact with each other. Here, an individualized approach, i.e., the selection of suitable phages for each patient, is necessary.

Source and more information: https://www.pharmazeutische-zeitung.de/bakterienkiller-in-der-klinik/